If you’re running a Palo 5200/7000 series firewall, you may have inserted transceiver modules and the only way you really know they’re recognized is if you get them online. While troubleshooting an issue, I found a item from the Palo Alto KB, namely the log file
brdagent.log is where you can view the transceiver you inserted; the log itself is for monitoring interfaces and other networking chips being inserted (see book link below).
To view the log, I prefer to use the
tail command to view the log, which is a Unix/Linux command to view the last section of the log file, and even to watch the log file as it’s being used.
tail lines 100 follow yes cp-log brdagent.log
<bunch of log files>
cp brdagent.log 2019-10-03 17:10:40 2019-10-03 17:10:40.001 -0600 Port 25: Down 40Gb/s-full duplex
cp brdagent.log 2019-10-03 17:10:40 2019-10-03 17:10:40.001 -0600 PORT25: board_port_autoneg_enabled -> board_port_autoneg, link: 0, mode: 1
cp brdagent.log 2019-10-03 17:11:40 2019-10-03 17:11:40.644 -0600 Error: gryphon_get_port_info(5200/gryphon_ports.c:1231): Remote fault detected on port 25!
cp brdagent.log 2019-10-03 17:13:22 2019-10-03 17:13:22.156 -0600 Port 25: sysd_obj_lookup for <QSFP> failed !!!
cp brdagent.log 2019-10-03 17:13:22 2019-10-03 17:13:22.156 -0600 Port 25: Empty QSFP+ detected
cp brdagent.log 2019-10-03 17:14:07 2019-10-03 17:14:07.441 -0600 QSFP+ detected on port 25
cp brdagent.log 2019-10-03 17:14:07 vendor 'FINISAR CORP. '; part 'FTL4E1QE1C-A5 '; id 'QSFPP'
The command broken down:
tail– the Unix/Linux command that displays the last section of a file
lines 100– displays the last 100 lines (or less) of the file
follow yes– informs the cli to continue printing any additional input to the file
cp-log– this is a directory for control plane logs, and according to Tom Piens with the Mastering Palo Alto Networks book below, there a few different directories for the management plane, data plane, and other logs. The log directories will vary based on models.
brdagent.log– the log filename.
As you see in the log above, you can see the the QSFP transceiver in the log. Using the
tail follow command though, you can watch as transceivers are inserted, like this (I inserted a Cisco twinax as an example):
2021-05-25 13:50:34.663 -0600 Port 19: SFP Plus Empty detected
2021-05-25 13:50:51.756 -0600 Port 19 :: sfp_data.transceiver_codes(str) = 10000
2021-05-25 13:50:51.756 -0600 SFP Plus detected on port 19
vendor 'CISCO-TYCO '; part '2053783-3 '; tc '10000'
2021-05-25 13:50:51.757 -0600 Port 19: SFP Plus Fiber detected
2021-05-25 13:50:51.757 -0600 PORT19: board_port_sfp_nopop_0 -> board_port_startup, link: 0, mode: 2
2021-05-25 13:50:51.761 -0600 PORT19: board_port_startup -> board_port_autoneg, link: 0, mode: 2
2021-05-25 13:50:51.764 -0600 PORT19: board_port_autoneg -> board_port_autoneg_linked, link: 1, mode: 2
2021-05-25 13:50:51.764 -0600 Port 19: Up 10Gb/s-full duplex
I actually found a pretty good book that I purchased which breaks this down some of these commands. Mastering Palo Alto Networks: Deploy and manage industry-leading PAN-OS 10.x solutions to secure your users and infrastructure explains how to view some of these logs, particularly the section on ‘Debugging Processes’.
Other Transceiver Bits
Some additional bits I’ve learned recently:
- Yes, you can other vendor/third-party transceivers in Palo Alto firewalls. Palo Alto publishes the details of the transceivers here. I haven’t ever encountered issues with other vendor transceivers, but that said, getting support if you have an issue and the transceiver is potentially the problem may not result in support from customer support.
- While troubleshooting an HSCI port, I found that I could test if the optic was functioning correctly from the HSCI connecting the port to a switch and configuring layer 2 connectivity (ethernet). The transceiver responded, which makes sense because the configuration in HA sets the transport for HSCI as ethernet. Even though Palo says, “[t]he traffic carried on the HSCI ports is raw Layer 1 traffic, which is not routable or switchable. Therefore, you must connect the HSCI ports directly to each other (from the HSCI port on the first firewall to the HSCI port on the second firewall),” I found the HSCI at least responds to ethernet. So perhaps they mention this to indicate you shouldn’t bridge the connection (via layer 2 switch).
- If you’re not getting complete session sync between a pair of HA firewalls, and even though your HA is showing as up, you should perhaps check your transceivers, particularly if you’re using non-Palo Alto transceivers.